Dear Readers,
The Taliban victory in Afghanistan unleashed anger at U.S. President Joe Biden, his critics accusing his administration of, among other things, leaving a regional vacuum in Central Asia that China and Russia will rush to fill. The U.S. along Western nations, and of course, India (His Master’s Voice) shut down their Embassies in Kabul after the takeover in August. International agencies moved to deny access to money committed to Afghanistan while Washington froze some US$9 billion in assets of Afghanistan’s central bank. While no country has formally recognized the Taliban regime, nations such as China, Pakistan, Russia, Iran and Qatar have kept their embassies in Kabul open. The United Nations has raised $1 billion in emergency assistance and has dispatched several high-level delegations to meet with Taliban leaders in Kabul.
The American venture into Afghanistan was a serious strategic failure, there is a strong temptation for US policymakers to find someone to blame. Cambodia was the scapegoat for the botched war in Vietnam, now Afghanistan’s neighboring countries present a convenient target. Pakistan has mostly been treated as an unreliable ally and there are clear signs that efforts are on to channel frustration and anger towards Pakistan, this would be another strategic misstep.
Had there been any fairness in this world, the US would be held accountable for war crimes. In a world where might may not be seen to be right, the US and NATO would be doling out reparations and damages for occupying Afghanistan and removing its government. Perhaps, the champion of all things moral and noble, the US could, in a gesture of fair play and kindness, unfreeze Afghan assets and provide developmental assistance to the Taliban, a far more reliable and honest partner than the corrupt to the core Ashraf Ghani and his coterie of robbers. Pragmatism must be shown by all parties concerned, an inclusive government that represents all nationalities and factions be allowed in Afghanistan and help and assistance must be forthcoming, one must also be mindful that the Taliban who have changed their ways to some degree, will take some time to transform completely. For the benefit of readers my article titled “Pragmatic Partnering” is appended below:
“For many countries and politicians last month’s fall of Kabul came as a surprise, consequently, it left them clueless about how to handle the Taliban situation. To avoid messing up the whole region, China, Russia and Pakistan have a coordinated their response as confirmed recently by Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov. After a recent meeting on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly with Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi, US Secretary of State Authority Blinken confirmed that China, Pakistan and the US were on the same page with regard to Afghanistan.
The challenge posed by the Afghan uncertainty gives Pakistan a wonderful opportunity to mend its foreign policy stance in the matter. Never fully recognized as a partner of the US in their Afghan misadventure, instead being the subject of abuse Pakistan is now in sync with policies because of Asian cooperation is concentrating on Eurasian development now. While meeting with diplomats during a recent visit to Islamabad, I was pleasantly surprised about the unanimous praise for Pakistani govt entities across the board i.e. the Foreign Office, the Army, ISI, the Interior Ministry, KPK and Balochistan Provincial Govts etc. in helping them out in the Afghan situation. Most of all they praised our officials for being accessible (wonder of wonders!) and 24/7 attempting to give solutions to problems! This was done without fanfare and chest thumping (albeit except for a few exceptions), executed with efficiency while keeping the security of the foreign nationals paramount. Because of the Pakhtoon ethnicity across the divide of the “Durand Line” and landlocked Afghanistan dependent upon Pakistan for many of its critical needs, our destinies are intertwined unlike other countries in the region. If we want to seek peace and stability within Pakistan we cannot afford and/or sustain the spill over of violence and chaos.
Our newly found self-confidence based on extended cooperation with China on CPEC and an aggravation of US relations with China and Russia have opened up options for Pakistan nearly impossible just a couple of years ago. This will allow Pakistan to avoid its dependency on the US and strive for its own destiny as a foreign policy player in the international arena especially when the Afghan situation worsens.
The unwinnable ‘forever war’ damaged the US economy and society, resulting in a growing revulsion among Americans against this war. The Trump initiative to negotiate a peace agreement with the Taliban enabled the US face-saving exit, while according a credible political role to the once rag-tag conglomerate of Afghan fighters. With Biden changing the agreed date of withdrawal from May 2021 to September, the Taliban filled the power void created by the ineptitude of the Afghan National Army (ANA) and started taking over the areas being vacated. Having low motivation to fight against their Afghan brothers, ANA saw their possible future salaries vanish with the US exit. The Taliban encouraged them to hand over weapons peacefully and allowed them to go home.
The Taliban did not enter Kabul because of an agreement with the US, however with President Ashraf Ghani and other high-ranking officials fleeing the country, the US military left it to the Taliban to quickly take over Kabul to avoid a law and order situation (again without a shot fired). Despite the adverse media reaction, considering all the circumstances militarily the US made an orderly withdrawal without clashing with the Taliban who successively took over positions previously held by the Ashraf Ghani administration.
With NATO forces and Europe relying on their US partners the US taking all those decisions alone without keeping them in the loop created a considerable amount of frustration. With the affront of the Biden administration leaving France in the dark about AUKUS about their politico-military shift against China, NATO has suffered quite some cracks which make European powers revive their idea of a European security arrangements without the US.
Considering that peace within and without Afghanistan is in the interest of all other countries in the region, the formation of an inclusive government representing all nationalities and all major factions takes centre-stage importance. Foreign powers will keep looking at the inclusion of women into government positions. During the twenty years of foreign occupation, empowerment of women in urban surroundings has been quite successful and should not be reversed, but is not true in rural areas. That has certainly pitched urban against rural traditions where women remain more or less in their traditional position inside the house. These vagaries will touch the entire Afghan population. The Taliban is a rather decentralized movement consisting of various powerful leaders disagreeing, among other things, on the women question. A conservative, mainly tribal society that has for centuries lived in segregation is naturally feeling insecure about how to handle educated and self-confident, emancipated women. They will need time to make up their mind and adjust their attitudes.
The understanding and interpretation of Islam that has been around in Afghan society over decades will take time and given the fact that we are short of time both sides the Taliban and the foreign govts that make their recognition of the Afghan govt dependent on its inclusivity need to step by step adjust their positions and expectations to reach a compromise. Give credit to the Taliban for taking over the country without many shots fired, after a brief revolt even the Panjshir valley is quiet today. The new govt has assured all neighbours that it has no intentions to invade any neighbouring country and does not have territorial claims. That bodes well for Pakistan’s Durand-line problem to be solved in time! The US assurance during the UN meeting that humanitarian aid for Afghanistan would be permissible is a very important step in the right direction.
We must both avoid too high expectations about the Taliban or fanning old prejudices against them in the human rights field and by doing so fanning the hysteria among Afghans to leave the country. This deprives Afghanistan of skilled manpower to take the country forward. In addition, it makes good people refugees sitting and waiting for months or even years in camps in Africa and elsewhere for a visa to join the ‘developed’ world. Even with a visa most of them will be looked at with prejudice in their new locations. They will work below their qualifications, take the example of one of the Ghani government’s ministers evacuated to Germany working as a pizza delivery man. The Taliban have changed to a certain extent and have proven to be a reliable partner in the peace and withdrawal negotiations. This can proceed further but will not go on without slipping a couple of times.
The much-demanded human rights is a western idea that has not been adjusted to Afghan (and other) cultures. The equality of men and women even not fully achieved in the West needs time and so do ideas that only at the age of 18 years a person is legally mature. What about our own lawyer community objecting to the elevation of a widely respected female judge of some consequence to the Supreme Court on the pretext of seniority when over 50 such cases exist? Even human rights are fluid, the age of maturity came down in Europe from 21 to 18 and voting rights from the age of 16 and political influence on decision-making of children has been voiced by the “Fridays for Future” climate movement. Things are moving but change takes time. That is why compromises are needed we are short of time. Afghan people need food, security and a future. Pakistan with a better insight into all those problems than any other country will be the natural leader in the process.
“The opinions/views expressed in Defence Journal are entirely those of the writers and cannot be construed to reflect the official views of Defence Journal”.
