Friday, September 20, 2024

Administrative Restructuring for Devolution of Powers, Need for More Administrative Units

Inset

“Another method to devolve the administrative structure is suggested which does not warrant major decision making process or legislation. My Paper on further administrative devolution is enclosed. The necessity of creation of Chief Commissioners’ administrative units (provinces) was apparent after the last mega floods in 2010-11. The administrative handling of districts from a distant Provincial HQ “did put extraordinary burden on the present administrative structure. Ultimately smaller provinces will have to be conceded but meanwhile an administrative structure responsive to public grievances at short notice and near vicinity is the requirement of the day.

One Governor, one CM, one cabinet and one legislature for a province and the Chief Commissioner’s Units below this level are recommended. Besides taking the sting out of the present movement for provincial status in Hazara, Bahawalpur, Multan and Dera Ghazi Khan etc. it will be a big step for bringing governance within easy reach.

It is also felt that being a simple Administrative step it does not require any constitutional or legislation changes. A simple act of re­structuring administration can bring about an administrative structure much more responsive to the public needs and aspirations.”

Administrative Reforms for further Devolution of Powers

The only way you can defeat insurgency is to remain one step ahead’

US Army Special Forces teachings on guerrilla warfare/ counter insurgency

This may be equally true about the demand for new provinces.

Introduction

Pakistan is under tremendous stress as a nation mainly due to the effects of ‘war on terror’. Besides it is suffering from parochial, ethnic, and sectarian strife. It is further divided between the haves and have-nots due to immense economic disparity and a fast dwindling middle class. To compound its woes it has a very unwieldy administrative structure. Balochistan, the largest province has almost half its’ area (44%) but only 4.5% population, Punjab which accounts for over half of the population (56%) with another 10% living in other provinces, dominates the politics, bureaucracy and army.

The demand for new provinces is once again making the rounds with renewed vigour and strength. The renaming of NWFP as Khyber­ Pakhtunkhwa and the reaction in Hazara resulting in casualties had acted as a catalyst for this demand. It has given added impetus to the demand of a separate province in southern parts of Punjab. The demand for Bahawalpur and Seraiki Provinces has been voiced once again with intensity since the break-up of one unit in 1970. It is gaining momentum with emotional appeals to people with more vigour and it looks that sooner or later there will also be demand for a Potohar Province or even a Central Punjab Province besides Hazara and Udayana (ancient name of Swat Valley) in KPK. Similarly Mehran (upper Sindh) in Sindh besides Karachi, within the Balochistan union, demand for separate provinces for Pakhtun areas, the Coastal belt and Nasirabad Division are in the offing sooner than later

An attempt has been made to suggest a balanced administration structure within existing provincial structure with minor changes. These suggestions do not require any constitutional changes or legislation. They can be enacted forthwith taking the governance within easy reach of population by simple administrative measures.

Historical Background

It may be interesting to note the administrative evolution of Punjab after it’s annexation in 1849 after the 2nd Anglo-Sikh War it was placed under a Board of Administration headed by a Chief Commissioner assisted by a Judicial Commissioner and a Financial Commissioner, Sir Henry Lawrence was the first Chief Commissioner followed by Sir John Lawrence. Punjab was at that time a part of the Presidency of Bengal being ruled from Fort William Calcutta in the winters and Simla in the summers. The Chief Commissioner had all the powers of the Governor due to its distance from Calcutta. The primitive and inadequate communication system prevailing at that time made it difficult to administer it directly. Punjab was later raised to the level of a Lieutenant Governor’s province in 1859 and it became a Governor’s province years later in 1901. Trans Frontier Regions (later NWFP) were. Under a Chief Commissioner at Peshawar from 1905 till becoming a full-fledged province in 1935. Similarly, Sindh initially a province was placed under the Chief Commissioner of the Presidency of Bombay till re-granted the status of a province in 1935. Balochistan was also administrated by a Chief Commissioner known as Agent General to the Governor General till 1955, it was given the status of a full­ fledged province in 1970.

The Devolution Plan

The devolution plan did devolve the powers vertically downwards, however it failed to distribute these horizontally into different regions of a Province. It is true in all provinces where all powers are centralized at the Provincial Secretariat of all provincial departments putting public coming from distant areas at great inconvenience. A person from Sadiqabad or Rahim Yar Khan has still to come to Lahore to get an arms license as these powers are centralized in the Provincial Government. Similarly a person from Rajanpur or Dera Ghazi Khan has to come all the way to Lahore to get his problems sorted out at the Provincial Secretariat. Similarly people in Hub (Balochistan) are next door to Karachi, in fact it was part of Karachi division during the one unit days. Similarly people of coastal areas of Balochistan are too far away from Quetta to be beneficiaries of the Provincial largess. Haripur and Abbottabad are nearer to Islamabad than Peshawar. Punjab’s southern districts are nearer to Karachi than Lahore. The western districts of Punjab are nearer to Peshawar than the provincial capital. The public in Rawalpindi, Jhelum, Attack etc. find it convenient to get their problems solved from the Federal Government rather than the Provincial Government at far away Lahore.

Aim

The aim of this paper is to suggest devolution of administrative powers horizontally to enable easiest possible access to its citizens.

Objectives

It has the following objectives:

(a) The devolution of powers should be cost effective; it should reduce the cost of existing bureaucracy and not become an added burden like the previous plan of devolution.

(b) It should use the existing administrative echelons to the maximum and not create new ones.

(c) It should be in tune with psyche of general public and not create confusion as was done in bringing about changes in nomenclatures from time honoured designations of DC, AC etc. to new ones of District Officers i.e. EDO, DO, ODO.

Suggested Changes

Each Province may be grouped in following administrative units each headed by a Chief Commissioner:

Punjab

It can be divided into five administrative units

a. Lahore: Lahore, Sahiwal and Gujranwala Divisions)

b. Multan: Multan and DG Khan Divisions

c. Bahawalpur: Bahawalpur Division.

d. Rawalpindi: Rawalpindi Division with Mianwali District

e. Central Punjab. Faisalabad and Sargodha Divisions less Mianwali District.

Sindh

Three administrative units.

a. Karachi. Karachi with Thatta and Lasbela district of Balochistan.

b. Hyderabad. Hyderabad and Mirpurkhas divisions.

c. Sukkur. Larkana and Sukkur divisions.

Balochistan

Five administrative units.

a. Quetta. Quetta, Sibi Divisions and Mustung District.

b. Kalat. Kalat, Khuzdar and Kharan Districts’.

c. Makran. Makran Division and Awaran District.

d. Zhob. Zhob Division less Dera Bugti.

e. Nasirabad. Nasirabad Division along with Dera Bugti.

Khyber­ Pakhtunkhwa

Four administrative units:

a. Peshawar. Peshawar, Kohat and Mardan divisions

b. Dera Ismail Khan. Bannu and D.l.K. Divisions

c. Malakand. Malakand Division

d. Hazara. Hazara Division

New Administrative Units

Following new self-governing administrative units are suggested:

a. Tribal Areas. They may also be given the status of a province with their own customary laws and traditions just like the Gilgit-Baltistan Region.

b. Nasirabad. Nasirabad Division along with Dera Bugti and Jacobabad districts of Sindh is ideally located to form a separate province. it may be viewed from the point of view of bring governance within easy reach of local. It may be borne in mind that John Jacobs was ruler of this political entity extending from Khanpur (present Jacobabad) to Sibi in 19th century.

c. The Punjab districts of Bhakkar and Layyah being nearer to Dera Ismail Khan may be attached to that Administrative unit.

d. The districts of Lasbela, Jacobabad, Bhakkar and Layyah should be transferred to new administrative units subject to willingness of public to accept the change.

Recommendations

1. The head of the administrative units may be designated as the chief Commissioner or Additional Chief Secretary.

2. He should have all the powers enjoyed by the Chief Secretary of the Province.

3. The existing Commissioner’s offices may be merged wherever two or more divisions are being grouped together.

4. Similarly the Regional Police Officers offices may be combined where ever two divisions are being merged to form one IG (Police) office.

5. The above steps will save substantial manpower and expenditure due to merger of existing divisions to form Chief Commissionerates.

6. The IG (Police) of present Provinces may be re-designated as DG (Police) as in Indian Punjab.

7. The Board of Revenue should be devolved to these administrative units to bring it within easy access of general public in distant places.

8. All powers of Secretaries of the Provinces may be devolved to the respective Directors in the field.

9. The manpower rendered surplus due to mergers and lessening of work load at the Provincial Secretariat may be given choice and posted to respective Chief Commissioners.

10. The role of Chief Secretary and DG (Police) at the provincial capital should be basically coordination between other administrative units besides looking after that Commissionerate.

11. The Secretaries at the Provincial Secretariat should also be given the added responsibility of necessary coordination and liaison between various Commissioners.

12. All Chief Commissioners should be in grade-21 and Administration Secretaries in grade-20.

13. The Irrigation Department. It is having its own hierarchy on canal based administrative set up, need not be devolved down wards. However, the powers of Chief Engineers etc. may be restored to pre-partition levels which have been withdrawn due to political interference over a period of time.

14. Saving in Manpower. It is visualized that at least 25 to 30% percent saving in manpower will occur by devolving powers downwards from the Provincial Secretariats to the Chief Commissioner’s administrative units.

Conclusion

It is now time that the Government takes cognizance of the situation to forestall a Hazara like situation. The suggested administrative structure is very much in tune with present administrative set up and according to the psyche of our population. Any province can take the lead by becoming a trend setter for all other provinces in this respect by devolving more powers to outlying regions of the province as suggested. The best way to preempt the impending turmoil is to address these issues by taking decisions in time.

Many countries like India, Nigeria and Afghanistan etc. have resorted to having more viable administrative units in order to bring governance within easy reach besides sorting out other internal issues.

Yasub Ali Dogar
Brig (Retd) Yasub Ali Dogar is ex-mayor of Lahore & former advisor to Governor of the Punjab.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -

Latest Articles

- Advertisement -