The compulsions for survival has driven our leaders over the past decade to allow the US-Pakistan relationship to gradually degenerate into a master and slave status. Pakistan is now subjected to various insults across the board periodically, in the past year motivated vilification of the Pakistan Army and the ISI by key US public officials has become a regular affair. To add injury to the never-ending insults, 24 of our soldiers were brutally murdered by the strafing of four US helicopter gunships, most of them died in the first attack while asleep. While the borders may not be well marked, the map reference coordinates of our position at Salala 2 kms well inside Pakistan were well defined, US and NATO violated standard operating procedures (SOPs) governing coordination with Pakistan.
The universal perception, this was a calculated act of provocation for our perceived support for the Talibaan. Or was it more than that, the pre-meditated murder being done with a more sinister motive? The reaction in the drawing rooms of the elite matched the outrage in the streets, the near universal cry being “enough is enough”. PM Gilani rode the crest of the public anger with his “no further business as usual” stance.
To quote MK Bhadrakumar from a recent article, “Pakistan’s doublespeak (about drones) may be ending. Future US drone operations may have to be conducted factoring in the possibility that Pakistan might regard them as violations of its air space”. What he went onto say was more meaningful, “Washington may have seriously erred if the intention on Friday night was to draw out the Pakistani military into a retaliatory mode and then to hit it with a sledgehammer and make it crawl on its knees pleading mercy”.
The perfunctory “regret” aside, there is not even a hint of an apology, which master has ever apologized to a slave? To their credit, the Defence Cabinet Committee (DCC) did not turn the other cheek as usual, they decided to (1) close NATO’s supply through Pakistani territory immediately (2) demand the US vacate Shamsi airbase (meant for drone operations) within 15 days and (3) “revisit and undertake a complete review” of all “programs, activities and cooperative arrangements” with US , NATO and the international Security Assistance Force (ISAF), including in “diplomatic, political and intelligence” areas. The Federal Cabinet went one better in deciding not to participate in the Bonn Conference in early December.
The 140000 (97000 US and 43000 NATO) ISAF troops depend for fuel, food and equipment from outside landlocked Afghanistan. Spokesman Lt Gen Keeley insisted that their operations will not be affected because “ISAF uses a vast supply and distribution network to ensure coalition forces remain well-stocked”. Less than half is funnelled through so-called Northern Distribution Network (NDN) encompassing Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. Many knowledgeable logistical experts maintain that contrary to ISAF claims the NDN is not adequate enough for supplies in the longer-term, particularly because heavy weightage equipment and stores as well as aviation fuel comes through Pakistan. Speaking on NBC News, respected US defence analyst retired US General Barry McCaffrey warned the coalition effort in Afghanistan was “one step short of a strategic crisis. I do not believe we can continue operations at this rate, so we’ve got to talk to them, we’ve got to pay them, we’ve got to apologise for this strike. We have no option, literally”.
To quote my article “Terms of Endearment” on September 29, 2011 “Our civilian and military sacrifices compare at a ratio of almost 10:1 to all Afghan civilian and coalition forces put together. Is it an amazing coincidence that every time the PPP coalition is in danger of a meltdown, the army and the ISI are put on the block by the US to relieve the existential threat to this inept and corrupt Pakistani government?” This incongruous thought becomes stronger two months later, was the Salala strike meant to bail out Zardari because of the Haqqani Memo and or the NRO? Was the helicopter attack meant only as a warning shot, misfiring when a missile hit a billet full of soldiers sleeping off duty and the high casualty figures raised a storm? Nevertheless the NATO strike did shift attention from both the Memo and NRO. Unfortunately for Zardari, Husain Haqqani is not present in Wash DC to give it the usual spin about “the danger to democracy”. It would be nice if the President and Supreme Commander came out personally with a strong statement condemning this murderous attack instead of oblique references through his Spokesman. It may not altogether eliminate the pervasive suspicion about his inclinations and motives but it would go some way in partially dispelling the prevailing notion of all this being meant to distract the focus on him.
Teetering perilously on a fail-safe line as a much vilified partner in the US-led war, continuing without a defined “terms of engagement” is impossible. Former Gov Huntsman (and a Republic Presidential candidate) called our relationship correctly as being of a “transactional” nature. “Out of the box” thinking must provide for a genuinely productive and meaningful relationship in the future.
People like Sandy Berger, Bruce Reidel, etc have brushed off the Pakistani reaction as being without substance, confidently predicting we will be back “on line” with days. The dangers of our “crying wolf” once too often! The acid test of our political (and military) leaders will be to put the national interest over their personal salvation. Effective in his own quiet way, Kayani must comprehend the consequences of his remaining a perennial “silent soldier”. While he could possibly have considered fading from the scene as an option (the first year of his three year extension expired coincidentally on Nov 27), he has responsibilities not only to his soldiers dying under his command but also to the people of this country.
With the entire Republican slate of US Presidential candidates baying for our blood, I wrote two months ago, “The US Congress would do this country the greatest favour if it passes the Bill to cut off aid to Pakistan, this government can than declare freedom! First, we should re-affirm our commitment to continue fighting the war on terror, but on our own terms. Second, we must pull out as many troops as we can from FATA and mobilise the tribal militias as in the past. Third, we must not take any further aid of any kind, economic or military, saddled with conditions. Fourth, we must charge transit fees (and the wear and tear to our infra-structure) at internationally acceptable rates for all goods passing through Pakistani territory”. The NATO containers and oil tankers stuck up in Pakistani territory must be allowed through as they present a security threat but no more should be off-loaded from ships till we have a suitable agreement for payment of adequate transit fees in place.
To preserve sanity in a future relationship, sometimes a divorce is necessary. Pakistan must disengage from the war in Afghanistan while continuing our own war against terrorism within Pakistan. If the US wants to shed the blood of its young soldiers propping up someone like Karzai for the next 50 years, that is their call.
Courtesy: The News
